Circl Vulnerability Lookup
CIRCL Vulnerability-Lookup — aggregated vulnerability records
Que pouvez-vous faire avec Circl Vulnerability Lookup ?
circl_vuln(id, include_raw?)— one vulnerability by id. AcceptsCVE-,circl_vuln_search(vendor, product, limit?)— every vulnerability recordedcircl_vuln_recent(limit?)— the most recently published or updated records
Installation
Ajoutez ceci à la configuration MCP de votre client (Claude Desktop : claude_desktop_config.json ; Cursor : .cursor/mcp.json ; VS Code et les autres utilisent la même forme « mcpServers »).
claude mcp add --transport http circl-vulnerability-lookup 'https://gateway.pipeworx.io/circl-vulnerability-lookup/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"circl-vulnerability-lookup": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/circl-vulnerability-lookup/mcp"
}
}
}
Documentation
Tirée du README du projet sur GitHub, actualisée chaque semaine. Les liens ouvrent GitHub.
Sommaire
@pipeworx/circl-vulnerability-lookup
Vulnerability records from CIRCL's Vulnerability-Lookup service, which resolves one id against several upstream feeds at once — MITRE CVE, NVD, GitHub Security Advisories, PySec and vendor CSAF advisories.
Part of Pipeworx — an MCP gateway connecting AI agents to 1875+ live data sources. This is an independent, unofficial integration — not affiliated with, endorsed by, or published by the upstream provider.
Tools
circl_vuln(id, include_raw?)— one vulnerability by id. AcceptsCVE-,GHSA-,PYSEC-and vendor advisory ids alike. Returns a normalised summary (title, description, CVSS score/vector, affected products, references, dates) plus the untouched upstream record.circl_vuln_search(vendor, product, limit?)— every vulnerability recorded against a CPE vendor/product pair, newest first, tagged with the feed each record came from.circl_vuln_recent(limit?)— the most recently published or updated records across every aggregated feed.
Auth
Keyless.
Data sources
- https://vulnerability.circl.lu/api/vulnerability/{id} — one record by id.
- https://vulnerability.circl.lu/api/search/{vendor}/{product} — search.
- https://vulnerability.circl.lu/api/last/{n} — recent records.
Operated by CIRCL (Computer Incident Response Center Luxembourg).
Traps
- An unknown id answers
{}with HTTP 200. That is a silent zero — parsed naively it reads as a successful empty record.circl_vulnthrows a named miss instead. - The real paths are not the ones the names suggest. Search is
/api/search/{vendor}/{product}and the recent feed is/api/last/{n}./api/vulnerability/search/...and/api/vulnerability/lastare both 404. - Records arrive in three different schemas, and one
/api/lastresponse mixes all three:- CVE JSON 5.x —
cveMetadata+containers.cna - OSV —
id/details/affected/severity - CSAF —
document/product_tree/vulnerabilitiessummarize()normalises the shared fields across all three;rawkeeps the original. Do not assumecontainers.cnaexists.
- CVE JSON 5.x —
- CVSS lives under a version-specific key (
cvssV3_1,cvssV4_0, …) insidecontainers.cna.metrics[], so the code scans the metric objects rather than reaching for a fixed path. OSV records carry only a vector string inseverity[].score, with no numeric base score. - Vendor/product are matched against CPE strings, not marketing names — use
microsoft/windows_10, notMicrosoft Windows 10. - CIRCL rate-limits by source IP, and publishes the limits at
https://vulnerability.circl.lu/.well-known/api-policy.json: 20 requests
per minute anonymously, 40 with an
X-API-KEY. It does sendRetry-After(observed: 59) plusX-RateLimit-Limit/-Remaining/-Reset, and the 429 error here quotes it. This pack is keyless and stays inside the anonymous bucket — one tool call is one upstream request. If we ever need the higher tier, it is a header, not a rebuild. - The 429 is per backend worker, not global. Measured 2026-09-17: three
consecutive anonymous requests from one IP reported
x-ratelimit-remainingof 0, then 19, then 3, and one URL kept 429-ing while the next id answered 200 instantly. So a 429 here frequently says nothing about your actual usage —circlJson()retries up to 3 times before surfacing it. Do not read a single 429 as "we are being throttled".
Related packs
nvd (NVD directly, platform-keyed) and osv (OSV.dev, open-source package
advisories) cover single upstreams. This pack is the cross-feed id resolver: use
it when you have an id and do not know which body published it.
Quick Start
Add to your MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, etc.):
{
"mcpServers": {
"circl-vulnerability-lookup": {
"url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/circl-vulnerability-lookup/mcp"
}
}
}
What this endpoint actually serves
tools/list at https://gateway.pipeworx.io/circl-vulnerability-lookup/mcp returns the tools in the table
above plus the shared Pipeworx meta-tools — ask_pipeworx,
discover_tools, search_within, remember/recall and the rest of the
gateway-wide set. So the tool count you see is larger than this table: a
single-pack endpoint currently lists roughly 30 shared tools alongside the
pack's own. The connection's initialize response states its exact scope, and
is the authoritative answer for a given day.
This is deliberate, not multiplexing by accident. The meta-tools are what let a
scoped connection answer a question this pack does not cover — via
ask_pipeworx, which routes across the whole catalog — without you adding a
second MCP server. There is currently no way to mount a pack endpoint without
them; if the extra schemas cost you more context than the routing is worth,
connect to the full gateway once rather than to several pack endpoints.
Or connect to the full Pipeworx gateway to get every pack's tools listed directly, instead of just this one's:
{
"mcpServers": {
"pipeworx": {
"url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/mcp"
}
}
}
Both URLs reach the same gateway and the same 1875+ data sources. The
only difference is which pack's tools are listed directly; ask_pipeworx
reaches all of them from either one.
No MCP client? Call it over HTTP
curl -X POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/circl_vuln \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"id":"CVE-2014-0160","include_raw":false}'
No account needed for the first calls. Inspect any tool: GET https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/circl_vuln. Find one: POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/search_packs with {"query":"..."}.
Standalone (no gateway account)
This package also runs as a local stdio MCP server — no Pipeworx account, no gateway round-trip:
{
"mcpServers": {
"circl-vulnerability-lookup": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@pipeworx/mcp-circl-vulnerability-lookup"]
}
}
}
Or run it directly to confirm it starts:
npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-circl-vulnerability-lookup
It speaks MCP over stdin/stdout and answers initialize/tools/list/tools/call
for only this pack's tools — none of the shared meta-tools the gateway
connection above adds. Same source, same tools, no ask_pipeworx routing.
Using with ask_pipeworx
Instead of calling tools directly, you can ask questions in plain English — this works on the pack endpoint above as well as on the full gateway:
ask_pipeworx({ question: "your question about Circl Vulnerability Lookup data" })
The gateway picks the right tool and fills the arguments automatically.
More
License
MIT
Questions fréquentes
Qu'est-ce que Circl Vulnerability Lookup ?
CIRCL Vulnerability-Lookup — aggregated vulnerability records
Comment installer Circl Vulnerability Lookup ?
Il fonctionne comme serveur distant. Dans Claude Code : claude mcp add --transport http circl-vulnerability-lookup 'https://gateway.pipeworx.io/circl-vulnerability-lookup/mcp'. Pour les autres clients, collez la configuration JSON de cette page dans leurs réglages MCP.
Faut-il une clé API pour Circl Vulnerability Lookup ?
Son entrée au registre n'indique aucune clé ni secret obligatoire. Certaines fonctions peuvent tout de même demander un compte auprès du service auquel il se connecte.
Circl Vulnerability Lookup est-il open source ?
Oui. Son code est sur GitHub sous licence MIT.
Qui maintient Circl Vulnerability Lookup ?
Il est publié par pipeworx-io. AI.tn le référence sans le maintenir ni le recommander.
Issu du registre MCP officiel. Être listé n'est pas une recommandation : vérifiez le code et les permissions d'un serveur avant de lui donner accès à vos données.