Circl Vulnerability Lookup

Official registry Security

CIRCL Vulnerability-Lookup — aggregated vulnerability records

What can you do with Circl Vulnerability Lookup?

  • circl_vuln(id, include_raw?) — one vulnerability by id. Accepts CVE-,
  • circl_vuln_search(vendor, product, limit?) — every vulnerability recorded
  • circl_vuln_recent(limit?) — the most recently published or updated records

Install

Add this to your client's MCP configuration (Claude Desktop: claude_desktop_config.json; Cursor: .cursor/mcp.json; VS Code and others use the same "mcpServers" shape).

Remote (streamable-http)
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http circl-vulnerability-lookup 'https://gateway.pipeworx.io/circl-vulnerability-lookup/mcp'
JSON configuration (Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code)
{
    "mcpServers": {
        "circl-vulnerability-lookup": {
            "type": "http",
            "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/circl-vulnerability-lookup/mcp"
        }
    }
}

Documentation

From the project's README on GitHub, refreshed weekly. Links open on GitHub.

Contents
  1. @pipeworx/circl-vulnerability-lookup
  2. Tools
  3. Auth
  4. Data sources
  5. Traps
  6. Related packs
  7. Quick Start
  8. No MCP client? Call it over HTTP
  9. Standalone (no gateway account)
  10. Using with ask_pipeworx
  11. More
  12. License

@pipeworx/circl-vulnerability-lookup

Vulnerability records from CIRCL's Vulnerability-Lookup service, which resolves one id against several upstream feeds at once — MITRE CVE, NVD, GitHub Security Advisories, PySec and vendor CSAF advisories.

Part of Pipeworx — an MCP gateway connecting AI agents to 1875+ live data sources. This is an independent, unofficial integration — not affiliated with, endorsed by, or published by the upstream provider.

Tools

  • circl_vuln(id, include_raw?) — one vulnerability by id. Accepts CVE-, GHSA-, PYSEC- and vendor advisory ids alike. Returns a normalised summary (title, description, CVSS score/vector, affected products, references, dates) plus the untouched upstream record.
  • circl_vuln_search(vendor, product, limit?) — every vulnerability recorded against a CPE vendor/product pair, newest first, tagged with the feed each record came from.
  • circl_vuln_recent(limit?) — the most recently published or updated records across every aggregated feed.

Auth

Keyless.

Data sources

Operated by CIRCL (Computer Incident Response Center Luxembourg).

Traps

  • An unknown id answers {} with HTTP 200. That is a silent zero — parsed naively it reads as a successful empty record. circl_vuln throws a named miss instead.
  • The real paths are not the ones the names suggest. Search is /api/search/{vendor}/{product} and the recent feed is /api/last/{n}. /api/vulnerability/search/... and /api/vulnerability/last are both 404.
  • Records arrive in three different schemas, and one /api/last response mixes all three:
    • CVE JSON 5.x — cveMetadata + containers.cna
    • OSV — id / details / affected / severity
    • CSAF — document / product_tree / vulnerabilities summarize() normalises the shared fields across all three; raw keeps the original. Do not assume containers.cna exists.
  • CVSS lives under a version-specific key (cvssV3_1, cvssV4_0, …) inside containers.cna.metrics[], so the code scans the metric objects rather than reaching for a fixed path. OSV records carry only a vector string in severity[].score, with no numeric base score.
  • Vendor/product are matched against CPE strings, not marketing names — use microsoft/windows_10, not Microsoft Windows 10.
  • CIRCL rate-limits by source IP, and publishes the limits at https://vulnerability.circl.lu/.well-known/api-policy.json: 20 requests per minute anonymously, 40 with an X-API-KEY. It does send Retry-After (observed: 59) plus X-RateLimit-Limit/-Remaining/-Reset, and the 429 error here quotes it. This pack is keyless and stays inside the anonymous bucket — one tool call is one upstream request. If we ever need the higher tier, it is a header, not a rebuild.
  • The 429 is per backend worker, not global. Measured 2026-09-17: three consecutive anonymous requests from one IP reported x-ratelimit-remaining of 0, then 19, then 3, and one URL kept 429-ing while the next id answered 200 instantly. So a 429 here frequently says nothing about your actual usage — circlJson() retries up to 3 times before surfacing it. Do not read a single 429 as "we are being throttled".

nvd (NVD directly, platform-keyed) and osv (OSV.dev, open-source package advisories) cover single upstreams. This pack is the cross-feed id resolver: use it when you have an id and do not know which body published it.

Quick Start

Add to your MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, etc.):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "circl-vulnerability-lookup": {
      "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/circl-vulnerability-lookup/mcp"
    }
  }
}
What this endpoint actually serves

tools/list at https://gateway.pipeworx.io/circl-vulnerability-lookup/mcp returns the tools in the table above plus the shared Pipeworx meta-tools — ask_pipeworx, discover_tools, search_within, remember/recall and the rest of the gateway-wide set. So the tool count you see is larger than this table: a single-pack endpoint currently lists roughly 30 shared tools alongside the pack's own. The connection's initialize response states its exact scope, and is the authoritative answer for a given day.

This is deliberate, not multiplexing by accident. The meta-tools are what let a scoped connection answer a question this pack does not cover — via ask_pipeworx, which routes across the whole catalog — without you adding a second MCP server. There is currently no way to mount a pack endpoint without them; if the extra schemas cost you more context than the routing is worth, connect to the full gateway once rather than to several pack endpoints.

Or connect to the full Pipeworx gateway to get every pack's tools listed directly, instead of just this one's:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pipeworx": {
      "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Both URLs reach the same gateway and the same 1875+ data sources. The only difference is which pack's tools are listed directly; ask_pipeworx reaches all of them from either one.

No MCP client? Call it over HTTP

curl -X POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/circl_vuln \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"id":"CVE-2014-0160","include_raw":false}'

No account needed for the first calls. Inspect any tool: GET https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/circl_vuln. Find one: POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/search_packs with {"query":"..."}.

Standalone (no gateway account)

This package also runs as a local stdio MCP server — no Pipeworx account, no gateway round-trip:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "circl-vulnerability-lookup": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@pipeworx/mcp-circl-vulnerability-lookup"]
    }
  }
}

Or run it directly to confirm it starts:

npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-circl-vulnerability-lookup

It speaks MCP over stdin/stdout and answers initialize/tools/list/tools/call for only this pack's tools — none of the shared meta-tools the gateway connection above adds. Same source, same tools, no ask_pipeworx routing.

Using with ask_pipeworx

Instead of calling tools directly, you can ask questions in plain English — this works on the pack endpoint above as well as on the full gateway:

ask_pipeworx({ question: "your question about Circl Vulnerability Lookup data" })

The gateway picks the right tool and fills the arguments automatically.

More

License

MIT

Frequently asked questions

What is Circl Vulnerability Lookup?

CIRCL Vulnerability-Lookup — aggregated vulnerability records

How do I install Circl Vulnerability Lookup?

It runs as a remote server. In Claude Code: claude mcp add --transport http circl-vulnerability-lookup 'https://gateway.pipeworx.io/circl-vulnerability-lookup/mcp'. For other clients, paste the JSON configuration from this page into their MCP settings.

Does Circl Vulnerability Lookup need an API key?

Its registry entry lists no required key or secret. Some features may still need an account with the service it connects to.

Is Circl Vulnerability Lookup open source?

Yes. Its code is on GitHub under the MIT license.

Who maintains Circl Vulnerability Lookup?

It is published by pipeworx-io. AI.tn lists it but does not maintain or endorse it.

From the official MCP Registry. Listing is not an endorsement: review a server's code and permissions before giving it access to your data.