Ca Medical Exclusions

Registre officiel Santé

California DHCS Medi-Cal Suspended and Ineligible (S&I) Provider List screening — fleet #2805, the…

Que pouvez-vous faire avec Ca Medical Exclusions ?

  • Provider Type — hundreds of distinct values (Registered Nurse,
  • A published list-wide statutory basis — California Welfare &

Installation

Ajoutez ceci à la configuration MCP de votre client (Claude Desktop : claude_desktop_config.json ; Cursor : .cursor/mcp.json ; VS Code et les autres utilisent la même forme « mcpServers »).

Remote (streamable-http)
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http ca-medical-exclusions 'https://gateway.pipeworx.io/ca-medical-exclusions/mcp'
Configuration JSON (Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code)
{
    "mcpServers": {
        "ca-medical-exclusions": {
            "type": "http",
            "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/ca-medical-exclusions/mcp"
        }
    }
}

Documentation

Tirée du README du projet sur GitHub, actualisée chaque semaine. Les liens ouvrent GitHub.

Sommaire
  1. @pipeworx/ca-medical-exclusions
  2. Tools
  3. Auth
  4. Data sources
  5. Quick Start
  6. No MCP client? Call it over HTTP
  7. Standalone (no gateway account)
  8. Using with ask_pipeworx
  9. More
  10. License

@pipeworx/ca-medical-exclusions

California DHCS Medi-Cal Suspended and Ineligible (S&I) Provider List screening — check a provider by name, NPI or license/provider number against the ~23,400-row list of providers barred from California's Medicaid program, the state-level counterpart to the federal HHS OIG LEIE (leie pack) and the sibling of ny-omig-exclusions for New York.

Part of Pipeworx — an MCP gateway connecting AI agents to 1819+ live data sources. This is an independent, unofficial integration — not affiliated with, endorsed by, or published by the upstream provider.

Tools

  • ca_medical_check_exclusion(name?, npi?, license?, limit?) — screens a provider against the DHCS S&I List. An NPI or license match is an identification (both are exact, provider-specific identifiers); a name match — even an exact one — is a candidate lead only, since the list carries no date of birth and many entity rows have no first/middle name to disambiguate same-named providers.
  • ca_medical_exclusion_coverage() — total exclusions held, how many carry an NPI or license number, provider-type diversity, the oldest/newest suspension date, the list-wide statutory basis, and the CHHS Open Data Portal's "last modified" date for the baked copy this pack serves.

Auth

Keyless.

Data sources

Why the CHHS datastore, not dhcs.ca.gov/files.medi-cal.ca.gov directly

DHCS's own pages (dhcs.ca.gov, files.medi-cal.ca.gov) link the S&I List only as a month-named CSV — e.g. suspended-ineligible-list-august-2026.csv — whose filename changes on every monthly refresh, so it cannot be fetched by a fixed URL without first scraping the current filename from an HTML page. The SAME dataset (same CKAN resource_id, 48630a37-b5ba-4d3d-af54-e82b30e658a0) is also published on the California Health and Human Services (CHHS) Open Data Portal, data.ca.gov and catalog.data.gov — all three mirror the identical resource. The CHHS CKAN API's datastore_search/resource_show endpoints are keyed by that stable resource id, never by a filename, and return clean JSON directly (no CSV parsing). This pack uses that API.

Why this is baked, not a live proxy

Per root CLAUDE.md's standing rule for a table this size, the full list (23,433 rows at capture time, ~7.2MB as generated TypeScript) is baked by scripts/bake-index.mjs into src/ca-dhcs-index-data.ts, registered in workers/gateway/src/pack-baked-indexes.json, uploaded to KV at deploy, and injected into every call as args._bakedIndex — never a static module-scope import (fleet #2754: six packs doing that put ~48MB of retained heap into every gateway isolate and cost about one call in four as a Cloudflare 1102). A missing or malformed injection throws loudly rather than answering "not found" — see src/index.test.ts.

Re-run node mcps/ca-medical-exclusions/scripts/bake-index.mjs periodically (DHCS/CHHS update the list monthly) and recommit; data_as_of on every response says how stale the baked copy is relative to CHHS's own last_modified metadata.

What this data does NOT include — and what it does, that NY's list lacks

The task that filed this pack assumed DHCS publishes a per-record exclusion reason/authority field "which NY lacks." Checked directly against the live CHHS datastore (not assumed): that is not correct. DHCS's published fields are Last/First/Middle Name, AKA/DBA, Address, Provider Type, License Number, Provider Number(s) (NPIs and/or non-NPI codes like PHA410230), Date of Suspension, and Active Period — there is no per-row statute, reason code, or case citation. "Active Period" is "Indefinitely effective" for 23,431 of 23,433 rows and carries no reason either.

What California's list DOES carry that NY's OMIG list lacks:

  • Provider Type — hundreds of distinct values (Registered Nurse, Physician, Pharmacy, Entity/Corporation, etc.), returned on every match.
  • A published list-wide statutory basis — California Welfare & Institutions Code §§14043.6 and 14123 (felony conviction, a Medi-Cal-related misdemeanor, federal Medicare/Medicaid exclusion, loss of license, or contract breach). This applies to the WHOLE list, not per-record, and every response surfaces it as statutory_basis, clearly labelled as list-wide rather than an invented per-record reason.
Matching

provider_numbers is a comma-separated field in the source data that can mix 10-digit NPIs with non-NPI codes (pharmacy/registration numbers like PHA410230). This pack extracts the 10-digit tokens as npis at bake time; an npi query matches only against those. A license query matches the separate License Number field, digits-only, leading zeros stripped — the same comparison ny-omig-exclusions uses. Name queries match against the provider's assembled name (last, or last+first+middle) and any AKA/DBA, case/punctuation-insensitive.

Reachability

Verified live 2026-10-07 from both a laptop curl and a throwaway wrangler dev --remote Worker on the prod account: identical 200 responses from the Cloudflare edge on both datastore_search (the full ~8.68MB payload, in ~1.1s) and resource_show. Unlike oklahoma-code / utah-code / new-hampshire-code, this host needs no Supabase egress relay.

Quick Start

Add to your MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, etc.):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ca-medical-exclusions": {
      "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/ca-medical-exclusions/mcp"
    }
  }
}
What this endpoint actually serves

tools/list at https://gateway.pipeworx.io/ca-medical-exclusions/mcp returns the tools in the table above plus the shared Pipeworx meta-tools — ask_pipeworx, discover_tools, search_within, remember/recall and the rest of the gateway-wide set. So the tool count you see is larger than this table: a single-pack endpoint currently lists roughly 30 shared tools alongside the pack's own. The connection's initialize response states its exact scope, and is the authoritative answer for a given day.

This is deliberate, not multiplexing by accident. The meta-tools are what let a scoped connection answer a question this pack does not cover — via ask_pipeworx, which routes across the whole catalog — without you adding a second MCP server. There is currently no way to mount a pack endpoint without them; if the extra schemas cost you more context than the routing is worth, connect to the full gateway once rather than to several pack endpoints.

Or connect to the full Pipeworx gateway to get every pack's tools listed directly, instead of just this one's:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pipeworx": {
      "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Both URLs reach the same gateway and the same 1819+ data sources. The only difference is which pack's tools are listed directly; ask_pipeworx reaches all of them from either one.

No MCP client? Call it over HTTP

curl -X POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/ca_medical_check_exclusion \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"name":"111 Pharmacy"}'

No account needed for the first calls. Inspect any tool: GET https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/ca_medical_check_exclusion. Find one: POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/search_packs with {"query":"..."}.

Standalone (no gateway account)

This package also runs as a local stdio MCP server — no Pipeworx account, no gateway round-trip:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ca-medical-exclusions": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@pipeworx/mcp-ca-medical-exclusions"]
    }
  }
}

Or run it directly to confirm it starts:

npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-ca-medical-exclusions

It speaks MCP over stdin/stdout and answers initialize/tools/list/tools/call for only this pack's tools — none of the shared meta-tools the gateway connection above adds. Same source, same tools, no ask_pipeworx routing.

Using with ask_pipeworx

Instead of calling tools directly, you can ask questions in plain English — this works on the pack endpoint above as well as on the full gateway:

ask_pipeworx({ question: "your question about Ca Medical Exclusions data" })

The gateway picks the right tool and fills the arguments automatically.

More

License

MIT

Questions fréquentes

Qu'est-ce que Ca Medical Exclusions ?

California DHCS Medi-Cal Suspended and Ineligible (S&I) Provider List screening — fleet #2805, the…

Comment installer Ca Medical Exclusions ?

Il fonctionne comme serveur distant. Dans Claude Code : claude mcp add --transport http ca-medical-exclusions 'https://gateway.pipeworx.io/ca-medical-exclusions/mcp'. Pour les autres clients, collez la configuration JSON de cette page dans leurs réglages MCP.

Faut-il une clé API pour Ca Medical Exclusions ?

Son entrée au registre n'indique aucune clé ni secret obligatoire. Certaines fonctions peuvent tout de même demander un compte auprès du service auquel il se connecte.

Ca Medical Exclusions est-il open source ?

Oui. Son code est sur GitHub sous licence MIT.

Qui maintient Ca Medical Exclusions ?

Il est publié par pipeworx-io. AI.tn le référence sans le maintenir ni le recommander.

Issu du registre MCP officiel. Être listé n'est pas une recommandation : vérifiez le code et les permissions d'un serveur avant de lui donner accès à vos données.