Hardest reasoning tasks
Either one
They are practically level on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (52.6 and 52.4).
A side-by-side comparison of Gemini 4 Argon (Google) and Muse Wonder (Meta), from the published prices and specifications.
Each answer below comes straight from the published prices, specifications and independent benchmark results.
Either one
They are practically level on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (52.6 and 52.4).
Either one
They are practically level on Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR) (79.7% and 80.7%).
| Gemini 4 Argon | Muse Wonder | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Category | Language models | Language models |
| Status | Generally available | Generally available |
| Headline price | $4.00 / 1M tokens | No data |
| Input | $2.00 / 1M tokens | No data |
| Output | $10.00 / 1M tokens | No data |
| Cached input | $0.10 / 1M tokens | No data |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 66k | No data |
| Released | October 2026 | Oct 12, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Capabilities | Vision, Reasoning, Tool calling, Structured output, Prompt caching, Batch API | Vision, Reasoning, Tool calling |
| API model id | gemini-4-argon | muse-wonder-1.0 |
Leader in bold.
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 52.6 | 52.4 |
| SciCode | 61.8% | 60.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 57.1% | 50.1% |
| Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 79.7% | 80.7% |
Independent evaluations by Artificial Analysis, run the same way for every model, at the reasoning setting shown. Percentages unless marked as an index.
A price comparison is not possible: one of them has no comparable published price.
Both accept 1.05M tokens per request.
Gemini 4 Argon is made by Google and Muse Wonder by Meta. A price comparison is not possible: one of them has no comparable published price. Both accept 1.05M tokens per request. Only Gemini 4 Argon offers structured output, prompt caching, batch api.