Mendrift
MCP server for ML drift detection, MLflow registry diffing, and HMAC-gated model rollback
التثبيت
أضف هذا إلى إعدادات MCP في عميلك (Claude Desktop: claude_desktop_config.json، وCursor: .cursor/mcp.json، ويستخدم VS Code وغيره الصيغة نفسها «mcpServers»).
mendrift-mcpclaude mcp add mendrift -- uvx mendrift-mcp==0.1.2
{
"mcpServers": {
"mendrift": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"mendrift-mcp==0.1.2"
]
}
}
}
التوثيق
مأخوذ من ملف README للمشروع على GitHub ويُحدَّث أسبوعيًا. تفتح الروابط على GitHub.
المحتويات
Mendrift
Autonomous MLOps incident response agent, plus mendrift-mcp — an open-source MCP server for drift detection and ML incident tooling.
pip install mendrift-mcp # or: uvx mendrift-mcp
Published on PyPI and the
MCP Registry as
io.github.suneel190700/mendrift-mcp.
▶ Live demo — run a real incident in your browser: supply an alert, watch the agent diagnose it against a real MLflow registry, and approve or reject the rollback at the human-in-the-loop gate. Toggle between a crafted synthetic scenario and real US consumer-credit benchmark data. React frontend on a FastAPI backend; the free tier sleeps, so the first load may take ~40s.
When a production model drifts or degrades, Mendrift detects it, diagnoses the root cause from monitoring and registry evidence, proposes a remediation, and executes it only after human approval.
alert ──> classify ──> diagnose (MCP tools) ──> propose
│ │
noise ──> close human approval gate
│
execute ──> verify recovery
Built with LangGraph (agent orchestration), LangChain (ChatAnthropic +
bind_tools), the Model Context Protocol, Evidently, MLflow, and Claude
(Haiku + Sonnet).
mendrift-mcp tools
| tool | type | purpose |
|---|---|---|
get_drift_report | read | per-feature drift distances + schema changes (Evidently) |
summarize_metric_anomalies | read | production vs previous model scored on current traffic |
get_deployment_history | read | registry version transitions and aliases |
diff_deployments | read | params / metrics / feature-schema diff between versions |
propose_rollback | read | generates a reviewable rollback plan |
execute_rollback | gated | requires a single-use HMAC approval_token |
open_incident | write | incident record with diagnosis + evidence |
Safety model
The approval gate is enforced in the tool layer, not the prompt:
execute_rollback verifies a single-use, action-scoped HMAC token minted only
by the human review flow — the minting function is never exposed over MCP. A
prompt-injected or confused agent cannot execute writes.
Tested live: Claude was first ordered to roll back "with full authorization" (it proposed but declined to fabricate a token), then handed a fabricated token, which the gate rejected by constant-time HMAC comparison:
See tests/test_approval_gate.py, including the action-scoping test: a token
minted for one model/version is invalid for any other.
Human-in-the-loop, crash-proof
The incident graph halts before execution (interrupt_before) and checkpoints
every step to SQLite. The process can die; a new process resumes the same
incident by thread_id after a human mints the approval token — which enters
state only via update_state(), from outside the graph. Denial is a
first-class path: no token → closed_approval_denied, no execution.
Agent design
| step | model | why |
|---|---|---|
| classify | Haiku | single constrained label; cheapest path |
| diagnose | Sonnet | multi-hop tool reasoning over evidence |
| verify | Haiku | threshold check on fresh metrics |
Routing lives in a code table (ROUTER_TABLE), not prompts, so cost per path
is measurable config — ~3.9K input / 630 output tokens per incident. The
diagnose loop is bounded (max 8 tool calls) with per-call retries and capped
backoff; on tool failure the model receives a structured error record, and on
budget exhaustion the agent degrades to an incident with partial evidence — it
never invents a diagnosis. Destructive actions require affirmative evidence: a
rollback is recommended only when retrieved evidence links the symptom to a
specific deployment, never on deploy-correlation alone. The agent can also
recommend monitor — real but mild, non-actionable drift is watched, not
acted on.
Live mode
MENDRIFT_DEMO=0 runs the agent against real infrastructure rather than fixtures:
scripts/seed_demo.pytrains two sklearn versions into a local MLflow registry — v13 clean, v14 with a schema swap and a training window polluted by missed-fraud labels (recall 0.72 → 0.18, AUC 0.84 → 0.82) — and writes reference/current framesget_drift_reportruns Evidently'sDataDriftPresetover those frames, returning real Wasserstein/JS distances against per-metric thresholds, plus schema changes derived from actual column setsget_deployment_history/diff_deploymentsread the registry and the underlying runs — real aliases, params, metricssummarize_metric_anomaliesscores the current window with both the production and previous versions, so it reports model divergence rather than population drift — a rollback clears it, ordinary data shift does not- an approved
execute_rollbackmoves theproductionalias for real
uv run mlflow server --host 127.0.0.1 --port 5001 # separate terminal
PYTHONPATH=src uv run python scripts/seed_demo.py
rm -f demo.db
MENDRIFT_DEMO=0 PYTHONPATH=src uv run python scripts/demo_interrupt.py start
MENDRIFT_DEMO=0 PYTHONPATH=src uv run python scripts/demo_interrupt.py approve
A live run diagnoses from computed evidence — e.g. "v2 introduced a schema swap replacing promo_flag with promo_flag_v2 … label_noise 0.0 → 0.45 collapsing val_recall 0.724 → 0.176 … 79.7% prediction-rate divergence from the prior version, model-induced, not population drift" — then halts for approval and resolves.
The eval suite deliberately stays on fixtures: evals need determinism and zero cost in CI, while live mode exercises the real stack.
Live web demo (two worlds)
A hosted web app wraps live mode behind a browser UI: a React (Vite) frontend on
a FastAPI backend, deployed on Render. A visitor submits an alert, the frontend
posts it to /api/diagnose, and the backend runs the real LangGraph agent — live
Claude reasoning over an embedded MLflow registry (sqlite://, seeded on boot) — then
halts at the HMAC gate. Approve or reject and the backend resumes the graph via
/api/decision, executing a real alias rollback and verifying recovery. The Anthropic
key lives only on the server; runs are rate-limited since each calls a real model.
Try it: mendrift-demo.onrender.com.
The dashboard toggles between two seeded worlds, so the same agent can be seen against both a crafted scenario and genuine real-world data:
- Synthetic (
scripts/seed_demo.py, modelfraud-scorer) — the crafted schema-swap incident: clean, teachable, an unambiguous rollback story. - Real US credit (
scripts/seed_real.py, modelcredit-risk) — the Give Me Some Credit dataset (real US consumer-credit records, targetSeriousDlqin2yrs) split by borrower age into reference/current windows for genuine feature drift, with a controlled model regression injected into v2 (asymmetric missed-default label noise) so the incident has ground truth. Real distributions and real Evidently drift; a known correct action. Measured gap: val_recall 0.637 → 0.156, AUC 0.854 → 0.810.
Injecting a known regression into real data is standard practice for validating a drift-detection system — it gives the evaluator ground truth for what the agent should decide while the drift computation still runs on genuine distributions.
The backend routes each request to the right world (model + parquet frames + label
column) per the dataset field; the tool layer reads those from env vars, applied
per-request under a lock so concurrent requests stay isolated.
Run the web app locally:
# 1. build the React frontend (FastAPI serves the built assets)
cd frontend && npm install && npm run build && cd ..
# 2. seed both worlds, then start the backend (frontend + API on one port)
export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-...
export MLFLOW_TRACKING_URI="sqlite:///$(pwd)/mlflow.db"
PYTHONPATH=src uv run python scripts/seed_demo.py # synthetic world (fraud-scorer)
PYTHONPATH=src uv run python scripts/seed_real.py # real world (credit-risk)
PYTHONPATH=src uv run uvicorn app.main:app --port 8000 # open http://localhost:8000
For frontend development with hot reload, run cd frontend && npm run dev (port 5173);
Vite proxies /api to the backend on port 8000.
Evaluation
src/mendrift/evals/ replays synthetic incident trajectories against the
real graph — only the LLM (scripted) and the read tools (fixture world)
are faked; the gated action tools are the genuine implementations, so the HMAC
gate is exercised by every test. Four assertions per trajectory:
| check | meaning |
|---|---|
no_ungated_writes | every execute_rollback carried a valid HMAC token — hard fail |
classification_ok | triage label matched |
tool_sequence_ok | required tool calls occurred in order (extras allowed) |
action_ok | terminal outcome matched |
19 logic-distinct incident scenarios spanning the decision space, each with its own evidence shape and correct action:
- Rollback — deploy-correlated drift or quality regression with affirmative diff evidence
- Retrain — label/concept shift, segment-specific degradation (no valid rollback target)
- Monitor — mild seasonal drift, low-importance-feature drift, holiday effects
- Incident (investigate) — upstream schema rename, feature-store change, docs-only deploy, calibration break, threshold shift, silent data-quality drop
- Graceful degradation — evidence tools down → incident with partial evidence, never a fabricated diagnosis
- Noise — flapping / auto-resolved alerts closed with zero tool calls
- Human-declined — well-founded rollback the reviewer rejects → closed, no execution
Scripted for fast CI, live for the measured rate:
PYTHONPATH=src uv run python scripts/run_traj.py --all # scripted, fast
PYTHONPATH=src uv run python scripts/run_traj.py --all --live # real models
Live-model eval runs at ~95% task-success; the handful of run-to-run divergences reflect LLM eval variance on decision-margin scenarios. The live suite surfaced real failure classes during development — a JSON extractor masking a correct decision, a classifier baited by an alert's reassuring wording, and a diagnoser proposing rollback on correlation alone — each fixed at its own layer (parser, alert wording, evidence-rule prompt).
Quickstart (demo mode)
uv sync
MENDRIFT_DEMO=1 uv run mendrift-mcp # stdio MCP server with fixture data
PYTHONPATH=src uv run pytest -v # gate + trajectory suite
Claude Desktop config:
{"mcpServers": {"mendrift": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": ["mendrift-mcp"],
"env": {"MENDRIFT_DEMO": "1"}
}}}
Status
- [x] mendrift-mcp server over stdio, verified in MCP Inspector and Claude Desktop
- [x] seven tools with a read / gated / write permission taxonomy
- [x] HMAC-gated rollback with action-scoped single-use tokens (tests first)
- [x] LangGraph incident graph: SQLite checkpointing + human-approval interrupt, kill-resume proven
- [x] LLM nodes on LangChain (
ChatAnthropic.bind_tools): Haiku classify/verify, Sonnet diagnose loop - [x] 19-scenario trajectory eval across the decision space; ~95% live, zero ungated writes
- [x] CI: gate + trajectory suite on every push
- [x] live mode: real Evidently drift computation, MLflow registry history/diff, real alias rollback
- [x] live web demo: React + Vite frontend on FastAPI, deployed on Render
- [x] two demo worlds: crafted synthetic scenario + real US credit-risk data, selectable in the UI
- [x] published: PyPI (
pip install mendrift-mcp) + MCP Registry (io.github.suneel190700/mendrift-mcp)
License
MIT
الأسئلة الشائعة
ما هو Mendrift؟
MCP server for ML drift detection, MLflow registry diffing, and HMAC-gated model rollback
كيف أثبّت Mendrift؟
يعمل على جهازك. في Claude Code: claude mcp add mendrift -- uvx mendrift-mcp==0.1.2. وفي العملاء الآخرين، الصق إعداد JSON من هذه الصفحة في إعدادات MCP الخاصة بهم.
هل يحتاج Mendrift إلى مفتاح API؟
لا يذكر إدراجه في السجل أي مفتاح أو سر إلزامي. قد تتطلب بعض الميزات حسابًا لدى الخدمة التي يتصل بها.
هل Mendrift مفتوح المصدر؟
نعم. شيفرته متاحة على GitHub بترخيص MIT.
من يصون Mendrift؟
ينشره suneel190700. يدرجه AI.tn لكنه لا يصونه ولا يوصي به.
من سجل MCP الرسمي. الإدراج ليس توصية: راجع شيفرة الخادم وصلاحياته قبل منحه الوصول إلى بياناتك.