io.github.omitly/omitly-mcp

السجل الرسمي الإنتاجية

Omitly's local, verifiable PDF redaction for AI agents — your documents never leave your device.

التثبيت

أضف هذا إلى إعدادات MCP في عميلك (Claude Desktop: claude_desktop_config.json، وCursor: ‏.cursor/mcp.json، ويستخدم VS Code وغيره الصيغة نفسها «mcpServers»).

NPM package omitly-mcp
Claude Code
claude mcp add omitly-mcp -- npx -y omitly-mcp@5.2.0
إعداد JSON (Claude Desktop وCursor وVS Code)
{
    "mcpServers": {
        "omitly-mcp": {
            "command": "npx",
            "args": [
                "-y",
                "omitly-mcp@5.2.0"
            ]
        }
    }
}

التوثيق

مأخوذ من ملف README للمشروع على GitHub ويُحدَّث أسبوعيًا. تفتح الروابط على GitHub.

المحتويات
  1. omitly-mcp
  2. Install
  3. Skill (Claude Code)
  4. Tools
  5. PDF generation (create_pdf)
  6. Status
  7. Native engine
  8. Access control
  9. Licensing
  10. One-click install for Claude Desktop (MCPB, free tier only)
  11. Building from source

omitly-mcp

A Model Context Protocol server that exposes Omitly's local, verifiable PDF redaction to AI agents (Claude Code, Claude Desktop, and any other MCP client).

Repository scope and licence — please read before opening a PR.

This repository is source-available, not open source. See LICENSE: the code is published so you can read exactly what runs on your machine before you let it touch a confidential document. It is not licensed for reuse in other projects.

It contains the MCP server and the compiled wasm detection bundle. The Omitly redaction engine, the tamper-evidence seal and the licensing implementation are not in this repository and are developed privately; this code calls the engine, it does not contain it.

Development happens in a private repository and is mirrored here on release, so pull requests cannot be merged. Issues and security reports are very welcome — see SECURITY.md.

The point of difference: an agent can redact a document without uploading it anywhere. Redaction runs on-device through the Omitly engine and returns a signed audit log recording what was removed; the seal shows the delivered file is unchanged since it was sealed. It does not show that nothing else sensitive remains in the document — the opposite of pasting a confidential file into a chat model.

Five of the eleven tools (find_sensitive_regions, locate_text, check_redaction, verify_redaction, extract_pdf_text) work out of the box — npm install, no Rust toolchain, no native binary, no desktop app. They run on a wasm-bindgen build of the same detector that powers the web leak-checker at omitly.app, bundled directly in this package. create_pdf, the two write tools (redact_pdf, redact_by_entity), and the two seal-verification tools (verify_seal, verify_document) still need a configured native engine — see "Native engine" below. Neither seal tool has a wasm fallback yet: there is no wasm seal-verification path (tracked in issue #113), so both always require the native engine, even though checking a seal needs no licence.

Install

Add the server to your MCP client with npx — nothing to clone, build or compile. Published releases ship the wasm detector bundled, so a registry install never needs Rust.

Claude Code:

claude mcp add omitly --env OMITLY_ALLOWED_DIR=/path/agents/may/touch -- npx -y omitly-mcp

Claude Desktop (claude_desktop_config.json), Cursor (~/.cursor/mcp.json) and Windsurf (~/.codeium/windsurf/mcp_config.json) take the same entry:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "omitly": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "omitly-mcp"],
      "env": { "OMITLY_ALLOWED_DIR": "/path/agents/may/touch" }
    }
  }
}

Set OMITLY_ALLOWED_DIR to the folder holding the documents you want checked; without it the server uses the directory it was launched from (see "Access control"). Claude Desktop users can instead install the one-click .mcpb bundle (see "One-click install for Claude Desktop" below).

Five tools work out of the box. find_sensitive_regions and check_redaction are free but EVALUATION-marked and limited to 10 attempts a month, shared across the two, without a native engine (OMITLY_FREE_CAP changes the number); locate_text, verify_redaction and extract_pdf_text are free with no cap. Redaction (redact_pdf, redact_by_entity), create_pdf and seal verification need the native engine, which is not currently distributed outside the source repo (omitly#1405).

Skill (Claude Code)

The package ships a Claude skill at skill/SKILL.md: plain instructions that tell Claude when to reach for these tools and how to report results — masked values only, and what the free check does and does not prove.

Install it for Claude Code (user scope):

mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/omitly-redaction
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/omitly/omitly-mcp/main/skill/SKILL.md \
  -o ~/.claude/skills/omitly-redaction/SKILL.md

A project can instead keep the skill under .claude/skills/omitly-redaction/. The skill is instructions only; limits and the free cap are enforced by the server, not by the skill.

Tools

ToolWhat it does
find_sensitive_regionsScans a PDF on-device and returns PII candidates — email/SSN/phone/card plus Australian identifiers (TFN, ABN, ACN, Medicare, Centrelink CRN, IHI, BSB; check-digit validated where a published algorithm exists) — with page + exact coordinates, so the agent selects by entity and never guesses geometry. Best-effort pattern matching, not a compliance assessment. Optional regions (generic/us/au) narrows the listed kinds. Free tier (wasm) is EVALUATION-marked and counts toward the shared 10-attempts-a-month cap (see "Licensing"); a configured native engine is not capped.
locate_textResolves literal strings the model supplies (names, addresses — anything regex can't catch) to their page + coordinates. The model does the recognition; the engine does the geometry.
check_redactionAudits an ALREADY-redacted PDF and reports whether sensitive text still survives underneath the redaction marks, in prior incremental-update revisions, metadata, AcroForm fields, or attachments — the "did my black boxes actually remove the data?" check, with a coverage report scoping what was inspected. It also returns verdict — safe_to_send, needs_review (with blocking for a problem found) or cannot_verify — from the same presented-document check the desktop app's "Check any PDF" runs (native omitly-redact check or the bundled wasm check, one Rust function), with the fixed-copy result sections (what was checked, problems, review, what could not be checked). The full audit v2 report behind the verdict is not returned by this tool; it is available from the engine's check command. A verdict is about the check and what it covered (hidden, covered and recoverable content), never a statement that the document is safe. Free tier (wasm) is EVALUATION-marked and counts toward the shared 10-attempts-a-month cap (see "Licensing"); a configured native engine is not capped.
extract_pdf_textExtracts a PDF's full text, page by page, PII-MASKED BY DEFAULT so raw sensitive values never flood the model's context window. Each page's spans report the CHAR offset (not byte offset) and kind of every masked value, so an agent can still reason about position without seeing the raw value. masked: false is a documented, explicit opt-in to raw text. Free, no licence, works out of the box on the bundled wasm engine — a native engine is preferred when available (also enables the regions filter; wasm ignores it and scans every pattern). Never renders pages to images.
redact_by_entityOne-shot: find + filter by kind (email/ssn/phone/card/tfn/abn/acn/medicare/crn/ihi/bsb) and/or regions + redact + verify. The "just scrub the obvious PII" shortcut.
redact_pdfRemoves the underlying data from given regions of a PDF, verifies nothing survives, writes the redacted file, and returns the audit log.
verify_redactionRe-scans an already-redacted PDF and returns the verification verdict — the redaction-completeness check.
verify_sealCryptographically checks a PDF's embedded Omitly audit report and whole-file tamper-evidence seal (seal v1: Ed25519; seal v2, from Omitly 4.0: ML-DSA-87 with ECDSA P-384) — the tamper-evidence check, distinct from verify_redaction. Integrity, not identity: the signing key rides inside the file (per-install from the desktop app, or one-time for a single output from the engine), so a valid seal means "unchanged since sealed by the holder of this key", never "produced by Omitly" — compare sealFingerprint out-of-band for origin. Requires a native engine; no wasm fallback exists.
verify_documentRecipient trust-verification (omitly#113): the same seal/report check as verify_seal — not a survivor re-scan — aimed at someone who received a PDF from someone else and wants to confirm the file is unchanged since it was sealed (integrity, not identity — see verify_seal), without paying or licensing anything. Free, no licence. Currently requires a native engine like verify_seal (no wasm seal-verification path yet).
create_pdfGenerates a clean PDF from Markdown/HTML on-device, rendered through a real browser engine so it looks printed — instead of writing a throwaway reportlab/LaTeX script.
check_licenseReports the current licence or trial state — tier, trial days left, the vendor-signed licensee name, which resolution step supplied the licence, and whether it is bound to this machine. Free, takes no arguments, reads no document, and is re-resolved on every call so buy → save licence → call again works without a restart. Never returns the device fingerprint or the licence file's contents — device binding is a yes/no. Requires a native engine: the wasm free tier has no licence concept.
propose_redactionsomitly#1643, bring your own AI: proposes regions for a PERSON to accept in the Omitly desktop app. Writes nothing. Requires the desktop app to be running on this computer; on acceptance the desktop removes, verifies and seals, and the record shows a person decided (human-desktop).
get_proposal_statusFollows a queued proposal: pending, accepted, rejected, applied (with output path and verdict), failed or expired. Free; reads no document.
Accept-in-app (omitly#1643)

While the Omitly desktop app is running on the same computer with Settings → Connect your AI → "Accept proposals in Omitly" on (the default), redact_pdf and redact_by_entity do not run: they return { status: "queued", proposalId } and the redaction becomes a proposal a person accepts or rejects in the app. On acceptance the desktop runs its own verified-removal engine, the survivor scan and the seal, and the sealed record says a person decided (human-desktop); this path needs no native engine on the agent's side. propose_redactions is the explicit form of the same thing; get_proposal_status follows the outcome; the person picks the output path in Omitly's own save dialog (outputPath is kept as the client's suggestion). Needs an omitly-mcp release that knows the channel — an older server writes directly. With no desktop running (or the toggle off), the write tools behave exactly as before and the record says mcp-agent (not human-reviewed). The two sides talk through files under the state directory (OMITLY_STATE_DIR, else ~/.omitly: desktop.json, proposals/, clients/) — no socket, no network. The PDF and the engine stay on this computer; text a client asks for (for example extract_pdf_text) goes to wherever that client's model runs.

PDF generation (create_pdf)

create_pdf is served by a separate binary, omitly-pdf, kept apart from the redaction engine because generation is a different trust model from verifiable redaction. It renders Markdown (or raw HTML) through a headless Chromium-family browser (Chrome/Chromium/Edge/Brave; override with OMITLY_BROWSER_BIN) — the same engine family the Omitly app's webview uses, so output looks printed rather than script-generated. It needs the native omitly-pdf binary, which is not currently distributed (omitly#1405) and whose source is not in this repository; point OMITLY_PDF_BIN at a copy to enable this tool.

// stdin
{ "command": "create", "outputPath": "/abs/out.pdf",
  "source": "# Hello\n\nBody **markdown**", "format": "markdown", "title": "Hello" }
// stdout
{ "ok": true, "output": "/abs/out.pdf" }

Typical agent flows:

  • Quick: redact_by_entity (find + redact + verify in one call).
  • Careful: find_sensitive_regions / locate_text → review → redact_pdf → verify_redaction. Coordinates from find/locate drop straight into redact as its regions argument.

See DEMO.md for a full Claude Code walkthrough.

Status

The MCP surface (eleven tools, schemas, transport), the native engine binary (crates/omitly-cli, built as omitly-redact), and the bundled wasm engine (crates/leakcheck-wasm, covering the five free tools without a native binary) are all implemented and pass end-to-end tests. find_sensitive_regions is a first-pass detector (ASCII patterns, per-show-operator matching): treat its hits as candidates for review, not a completeness guarantee. An LLM can always supply additional regions directly.

Privacy of findings. This server processes files locally and never uploads them. Every tool result, though, is returned to your MCP client, so it enters that client's model context and goes wherever the client sends it: "nothing is uploaded" describes the file, not the results. The detection tools (find_sensitive_regions, check_redaction, verify_redaction) return a masked preview of each finding (e.g. •••-••-6789) rather than the raw value, and redaction is driven by page + coordinates. extract_pdf_text masks recognised values by default, but masked: false is an explicit opt-in under which raw text appears verbatim in the result and in the model's context. Masking covers only the recognised pattern kinds (email, SSN, phone, card and the Australian identifiers): a name, an address or a clause the detector does not know is returned as ordinary text. locate_text hits also carry a masked preview, but that mask hides all but the last four letters or digits of whatever text matched, so short or distinctive strings stay partly legible.

Engine contract (implemented in crates/omitly-cli)

The server spawns OMITLY_REDACT_BIN, writes a JSON request to stdin, and reads a JSON response from stdout. Any failure returns { "ok": false, "error": "..." } (the process still exits 0, so the caller reads ok rather than the exit code).

// stdin
{ "command": "find", "pdfPath": "..." }
// stdout
{ "ok": true, "count": 2, "regions": [
  { "page": 0, "x": 250.4, "y": 610.4, "width": 79.2, "height": 14.4, "kind": "ssn", "preview": "•••-••-6789" } ] }
// `preview` is masked — the raw value never leaves the process; redaction is driven by coordinates.
// stdin — "masked" omitted ⇒ true (the default); pass "masked": false for the
// documented raw-text opt-in. "regions" narrows detected kinds (generic
// kinds like email/card always apply).
{ "command": "extract_text", "pdfPath": "..." }
// stdout — "spans" offsets are CHAR (not byte) offsets into "text", valid
// against either the masked or the raw text of the same page (masking never
// changes a page's character count). A page whose text could not be fully
// read reports "contentDecoded": false rather than being silently skipped;
// any text that was read is still returned, so treat that page as incomplete.
{ "ok": true, "masked": true, "pages": [
  { "page": 0, "contentDecoded": true,
    "text": "Sensitive sample line: SSN •••-••-6789",
    "spans": [ { "kind": "ssn", "start": 24, "end": 35 } ] } ] }
// stdin
{ "command": "redact", "pdfPath": "...", "outputPath": "...",
  "regions": [{ "page": 0, "x": 72, "y": 700, "width": 200, "height": 14, "reason": "PII.SSN" }] }
// stdout — also writes "<outputPath>.audit.json" beside the file
{ "ok": true, "output": "...", "audit": { "verdict": "pass", "regions": [ ... ], "warnings": [], "metadataScrubbed": true } }
// stdin — recovers the redacted regions from "<pdfPath>.audit.json"
{ "command": "verify", "pdfPath": "..." }
// stdout — hiddenContent re-checks thumbnails / document actions / embedded
// files on the delivered bytes (omitly#171); any fail flips the verdict
{ "ok": true, "verdict": "pass", "regions": [ ... ], "metadataScrubbed": true,
  "hiddenContent": [ { "class": "thumbnails", "verification": { "result": "pass" } }, ... ] }
// stdin — checks the embedded audit report + whole-file seal (v1 or v2), not
// redaction completeness (that's "verify" above)
{ "command": "verify_seal", "pdfPath": "..." }
// stdout — verdict is one of: no_report | seal_invalid |
// seal_unsupported_version | incomplete | verified. seal_unsupported_version
// means this verifier is too old to check the seal at all — sealValid is
// `null` (checked nothing), never true or false; carriesAuditReport flags
// whether the file also carries an Omitly audit report (escalation signal).
// sealRemoved (omitly#1591) is true when the file carries a sealed report but
// no seal at all (typically re-saved in another app) — a reason beside
// seal_invalid or a v2 cannot_verify, never a verdict of its own.
{ "ok": true, "verdict": "verified", "sealValid": true, "sealFingerprint": "...",
  "allPassed": true, "metadataScrubbed": true, "regionCount": 2, "pageCount": 4,
  "warnings": [], "licenseProvenance": null,
  "inputSha256": "...", "outputSha256": "...",
  "sourceFilename": "...", "outputFilename": "..." }
// stdin — omitly#1267: the Safe to Send verdict over the file AS PRESENTED
// (the desktop "Check any PDF" check; the bundled wasm `check` returns the
// same object). Free, read-only, no qpdf.
{ "command": "check", "pdfPath": "..." }
// stdout — verdict is one of: safe_to_send | needs_review | cannot_verify;
// "blocking" marks a problem found (e.g. text recoverable under a box).
// These are verdicts about the CHECK, scoped to what it covered
// (result.checked / result.notChecked) — never "the document is safe".
// "report" is the presented audit v2 report, present only when it verified;
// "reason_code" is set only for input_too_large / check_failed.
{ "ok": true, "check": { "verdict": "needs_review", "blocking": true,
  "result": { "state": "needs_review", "summary": "...", "problems": [ { "text": "...", "pages": [1] } ], ... },
  "report": { "schema": "omitly.audit/v2", "release_check": { "mode": "presented", "overall": "unsafe", ... }, ... },
  "reason_code": null } }

The MCP tool verify_document (omitly#113) shells out to the exact same verify_seal engine command above — it is the recipient-facing name/wording for the same seal/report integrity check, not a separate engine command.

Native engine

create_pdf, verify_seal, verify_document and the two write tools (redact_pdf, redact_by_entity) always need a native engine configured; the five free tools use the bundled wasm engine unless one is. The native binaries (omitly-redact, omitly-pdf) are not currently distributed outside the source repo (omitly#1405). Neither seal tool has a wasm fallback, even though checking a seal carries no licence requirement (see "Licensing" below).

One env var covers both binaries: OMITLY_ENGINE_DIR is the directory holding omitly-redact and omitly-pdf. Per-binary overrides (OMITLY_REDACT_BIN, OMITLY_PDF_BIN) win over the directory when set. When OMITLY_ENGINE_DIR (or OMITLY_REDACT_BIN) isn't set, find_sensitive_regions, locate_text, check_redaction, and extract_pdf_text transparently use the bundled wasm engine instead — same detector, no native binary (extract_pdf_text's optional regions filter is native-only; wasm scans every pattern and notes that the filter was ignored). verify_redaction does too, but with a narrower check: without a native engine there's no <path>.audit.json sidecar to verify specific regions against, so it falls back to a general re-scan of the whole file (still useful — a non-empty result still means the file isn't clean — just not the same rigor as the sidecar-based check).

find/redact need qpdf for the redaction pipeline (QPDF_BIN overrides the PATH lookup). find alone (native or wasm) is read-only and works without it.

Access control

Every path in a tool call comes from the model, so the server confines all reads and writes to one allowed directory:

  • OMITLY_ALLOWED_DIR — set it in the MCP config (recommended). Without it, the directory the server was started in is used.
  • Symlinks are resolved before the check, so a link inside the root pointing outside it is refused.
  • Outputs never overwrite an existing file (or its .audit.json sidecar); the agent is asked to pick a fresh name instead.
  • OMITLY_ENGINE_TIMEOUT_MS (default 120000) — a wedged engine process is killed at the deadline instead of hanging the agent's tool call.

These are guardrails against confused-deputy mistakes, not a sandbox against a hostile local user — see docs/THREAT-MODEL.md.

Licensing

redact_pdf/redact_by_entity are the write surface, enforced inside the engine binary (not in this server, and not bypassable by the bundled wasm fallback — wasm never touches these two tools): a Pro or Personal licence (OMITLY_LICENSE_FILE, or the Omitly desktop app's activated licence on the same machine) runs unmarked; otherwise the shared 14-day trial applies and the audit output is permanently marked as evaluation output. The redaction itself is never degraded, and licence checks never touch the network. find_sensitive_regions, locate_text, check_redaction, verify_redaction, verify_seal, verify_document, and extract_pdf_text are free — and locate_text/verify_redaction/verify_seal/verify_document/extract_pdf_text are free forever with no cap and no marking (recipient-side verification and on-device extraction are the point, not a metered funnel). The two free detection tools (find_sensitive_regions, check_redaction) on the wasm tier — i.e. with no native engine configured — are metered (omitly#226): results carry an evaluation: true flag plus an EVALUATION banner, and after 10 attempts a month across the two tools (one shared counter; OMITLY_FREE_CAP changes the number) the tool returns a structured { blocked: true, reason: "free-cap" } refusal until the month rolls over. The count lives in ~/.omitly/usage.json (override the directory with OMITLY_STATE_DIR; written 0600) and is local-only — nothing ever phones home; deleting the file resets the free count, which is accepted (the no-network doctrine makes it unavoidable), and the counter is deliberately never consulted by any paid write path. An attempt is counted before the scan runs, so a failed attempt still counts. Calls served by a configured native engine (licensed or not) are not metered here — that user is in the engine funnel, where the licence rules above apply. verify_seal and verify_document (both native-only) stay free by the same design in crates/omitly-cli (no Pro/Personal licence check on that command path either — both tools shell out to the identical verify_seal engine command).

One-click install for Claude Desktop (MCPB, free tier only)

mcpb/ packages the four free/diagnosis tools (check_redaction, find_sensitive_regions, locate_text, verify_redaction) — never the write tools — as a self-contained MCPB .mcpb extension: no Node/npm/Rust toolchain on the end user's machine, just "Install Extension…" in Claude Desktop. This is a deliberately smaller, separate server (mcpb/server/index.js) from dist/index.js above, so the bundle can never expose redact_pdf/redact_by_entity/create_pdf even by accident.

Download: releases.omitly.app/mcp/omitly-leak-check.mcpb — always the current version (published by publish-npm.yml on every real omitly-mcp release; a versioned copy + checksum also live at mcp/latest.json). Drag the downloaded file into Claude Desktop, or use "Install Extension…".

To build the bundle yourself, see "Building from source".

Not signed (mcpb sign needs a code-signing cert we don't have yet — same gate as desktop app signing). mcpb info on the packed file confirms WARNING: Not signed. Whether Claude Desktop's "Install Extension…" flow blocks or just warns on an unsigned .mcpb has NOT been confirmed against the real Desktop app in this change (no Desktop GUI in this environment) — that check is still open, tracked in omitly#225.

Building from source

Building this repository. A registry install (see "Install") needs none of this.

The server and the free tools (no native engine):

cd omitly-mcp
npm install
npm run build  # plain tsc; the wasm bundle ships prebuilt in wasm/
node dist/index.js

This repository ships the compiled wasm bundle in wasm/, alongside wasm/leakcheck_wasm_bg.wasm.sha256 so you can verify the byte-for-byte artifact you received. It is the same bundle published in the npm package. That means npm install && npm run build && npm test works here with no Rust toolchain: npm run build is plain tsc. The wasm is compiled from the Omitly detection engine, whose Rust source is not part of this repository (see "Repository scope" above).

The native engine binaries (for create_pdf, the seal tools and the write tools; see "Native engine"):

# Build and start the MCP server (no Rust toolchain needed)
npm install
npm run build
node dist/index.js

# To enable the native-engine tools as well, point at a directory containing
# the Omitly engine binaries (omitly-redact, omitly-pdf). They are not currently
# distributed (omitly#1405), and their source is not in this repository.
OMITLY_ENGINE_DIR=/abs/path/to/engine node dist/index.js

Registering a local build with Claude Code:

claude mcp add omitly -- env \
  OMITLY_ENGINE_DIR=/path/to/engine-dir \
  OMITLY_ALLOWED_DIR=/path/agents/may/touch \
  node /abs/path/to/omitly-mcp/dist/index.js

or in Claude Desktop's claude_desktop_config.json:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "omitly": {
      "command": "node",
      "args": ["/abs/path/to/omitly-mcp/dist/index.js"],
      "env": {
        "OMITLY_ENGINE_DIR": "/path/to/engine-dir",
        "OMITLY_ALLOWED_DIR": "/path/agents/may/touch"
      }
    }
  }
}

The MCPB bundle:

npm run mcpb:pack   # copy wasm/ into mcpb/wasm + npm install + mcpb pack
                     # → dist-mcpb/omitly-leak-check.mcpb

mcpb:pack needs no Rust toolchain — it reuses the prebuilt wasm/ in this repository (builds the shared wasm detector once, then copies it into mcpb/ — see mcpb/scripts/copy-wasm.mjs). The packed .mcpb itself needs nothing but Node, already bundled inside Claude Desktop.

الأسئلة الشائعة

ما هو io.github.omitly/omitly-mcp؟

Omitly's local, verifiable PDF redaction for AI agents — your documents never leave your device.

كيف أثبّت io.github.omitly/omitly-mcp؟

يعمل على جهازك. في Claude Code: claude mcp add omitly-mcp -- npx -y omitly-mcp@5.2.0. وفي العملاء الآخرين، الصق إعداد JSON من هذه الصفحة في إعدادات MCP الخاصة بهم.

هل يحتاج io.github.omitly/omitly-mcp إلى مفتاح API؟

لا يذكر إدراجه في السجل أي مفتاح أو سر إلزامي. قد تتطلب بعض الميزات حسابًا لدى الخدمة التي يتصل بها.

هل io.github.omitly/omitly-mcp مفتوح المصدر؟

شيفرته علنية على GitHub، لكن المستودع لا يعلن ترخيصًا قياسيًا.

من يصون io.github.omitly/omitly-mcp؟

ينشره omitly. يدرجه AI.tn لكنه لا يصونه ولا يوصي به.

من سجل MCP الرسمي. الإدراج ليس توصية: راجع شيفرة الخادم وصلاحياته قبل منحه الوصول إلى بياناتك.