Command A Reasoning vs Ministral 3 14B: price, context and capabilities

Choose Ministral 3 14B for self-hosting and data control, images as input and the latest release; on the other points the two are level or the data is missing.

In short

  • A price comparison is not possible: one of them has no comparable published price.
  • Both accept 256k tokens per request.
  • Ministral 3 14B is the newer model (December 2025, against August 2025).
  • Only Command A Reasoning offers reasoning.
  • Only Ministral 3 14B offers vision, self-hostable.

Open in the full comparison table

Which should you choose?

Each answer below comes straight from the published prices, specifications and independent benchmark results.

Self-hosting and data control

Choose Ministral 3 14B

Ministral 3 14B has open weights, so you can run it on your own servers; Command A Reasoning is only available through its provider.

Images as input

Choose Ministral 3 14B

Ministral 3 14B accepts images as input; Command A Reasoning does not.

Latest release

Choose Ministral 3 14B

Ministral 3 14B is the newer release (December 2025, against August 2025 for Command A Reasoning).

Specifications side by side

Command A ReasoningMinistral 3 14B
ProviderCohereMistral AI
CategoryLanguage modelsLanguage models
StatusGenerally availableGenerally available
Headline priceNo dataNo data
InputNo dataNo data
OutputNo dataNo data
Cached inputNo dataNo data
Context window256k256k
Max outputNo dataNo data
ReleasedAugust 2025December 2025
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
CapabilitiesReasoning, Tool callingVision, Tool calling, Self-hostable
API model idcommand-a-reasoning-08-2025ministral-14b-2512

Benchmarks side by side

Leader in bold.

BenchmarkCommand A ReasoningMinistral 3 14B
Intelligence Index No data 6
Terminal-Bench Hard No data 4.5%
SciCode No data 23.8%
GPQA Diamond No data 57.2%
Humanity's Last Exam No data 4.6%
IFBench (instruction following) No data 32%
τ²-Bench (agentic tool use) No data 27.2%
MMMU-Pro (visual reasoning) No data 49.8%
Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR) No data 26.3%

Independent evaluations by Artificial Analysis, run the same way for every model, at the reasoning setting shown. Percentages unless marked as an index.

Frequently asked questions

Should I choose Command A Reasoning or Ministral 3 14B?

Choose Ministral 3 14B for self-hosting and data control, images as input and the latest release; on the other points the two are level or the data is missing.

Which is cheaper, Command A Reasoning or Ministral 3 14B?

A price comparison is not possible: one of them has no comparable published price.

Which has the larger context window, Command A Reasoning or Ministral 3 14B?

Both accept 256k tokens per request.

What is the difference between Command A Reasoning and Ministral 3 14B?

Command A Reasoning is made by Cohere and Ministral 3 14B by Mistral AI. A price comparison is not possible: one of them has no comparable published price. Both accept 256k tokens per request. Ministral 3 14B is the newer model (December 2025, against August 2025). Only Command A Reasoning offers reasoning. Only Ministral 3 14B offers vision, self-hostable.

Which is newer, Command A Reasoning or Ministral 3 14B?

Ministral 3 14B was released on December 2025 and Command A Reasoning on August 2025.