Codestral vs Command A Reasoning: price, context and capabilities

Choose Command A Reasoning for very long inputs; on the other points the two are level or the data is missing.

In short

  • A price comparison is not possible: one of them has no comparable published price.
  • Command A Reasoning reads more per request: 256k tokens against 128k.
  • Only Command A Reasoning offers reasoning.

Open in the full comparison table

Which should you choose?

Each answer below comes straight from the published prices, specifications and independent benchmark results.

Very long inputs

Choose Command A Reasoning

Command A Reasoning reads up to 256k tokens per request, against 128k for Codestral.

Specifications side by side

CodestralCommand A Reasoning
ProviderMistral AICohere
CategoryLanguage modelsLanguage models
StatusGenerally availableGenerally available
Headline priceNo dataNo data
InputNo dataNo data
OutputNo dataNo data
Cached inputNo dataNo data
Context window128k256k
Max outputNo dataNo data
ReleasedAugust 2025August 2025
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
CapabilitiesTool callingReasoning, Tool calling
API model idcodestral-2508command-a-reasoning-08-2025

Frequently asked questions

Should I choose Codestral or Command A Reasoning?

Choose Command A Reasoning for very long inputs; on the other points the two are level or the data is missing.

Which is cheaper, Codestral or Command A Reasoning?

A price comparison is not possible: one of them has no comparable published price.

Which has the larger context window, Codestral or Command A Reasoning?

Command A Reasoning reads more per request: 256k tokens against 128k.

What is the difference between Codestral and Command A Reasoning?

Codestral is made by Mistral AI and Command A Reasoning by Cohere. A price comparison is not possible: one of them has no comparable published price. Command A Reasoning reads more per request: 256k tokens against 128k. Only Command A Reasoning offers reasoning.