Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3: price, context and capabilities

Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 for the hardest reasoning tasks and images as input; on the other points the two are level or the data is missing.

In short

  • A price comparison is not possible: one of them has no comparable published price.
  • Muse Spark 1.3 reads more per request: 1.05M tokens against 1M.
  • Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 offers vision, structured output, prompt caching, batch api.

Open in the full comparison table

Which should you choose?

Each answer below comes straight from the published prices, specifications and independent benchmark results.

Hardest reasoning tasks

Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores 56 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, against 48.1 for Muse Spark 1.3.

Reasoning over long documents

Either one

They are practically level on Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR) (82.7% and 83%).

Images as input

Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5

Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts images as input; Muse Spark 1.3 does not.

Specifications side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5Muse Spark 1.3
ProviderAnthropicMeta
CategoryLanguage modelsLanguage models
StatusGenerally availableGenerally available
Headline price$4.00 / 1M tokensNo data
Input$2.00 / 1M tokensNo data
Output$10.00 / 1M tokensNo data
Cached input$0.10 / 1M tokensNo data
Context window1M1.05M
Max output128kNo data
ReleasedSeptember 2026Sep 2, 2026
Knowledge cutoffJune 2026No data
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
CapabilitiesVision, Reasoning, Tool calling, Structured output, Prompt caching, Batch APIReasoning, Tool calling
API model idclaude-sonnet-5-5muse-spark-1.3

Benchmarks side by side

Leader in bold.

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Muse Spark 1.3
Intelligence Index 56 48.1
SciCode 61% 58.8%
Humanity's Last Exam 55% 48.7%
Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR) 82.7% 83%
GPQA Diamond No data 93.5%

Independent evaluations by Artificial Analysis, run the same way for every model, at the reasoning setting shown. Percentages unless marked as an index.

Frequently asked questions

Should I choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Muse Spark 1.3?

Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 for the hardest reasoning tasks and images as input; on the other points the two are level or the data is missing.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Muse Spark 1.3?

A price comparison is not possible: one of them has no comparable published price.

Which has the larger context window, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 reads more per request: 1.05M tokens against 1M.

What is the difference between Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Muse Spark 1.3?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is made by Anthropic and Muse Spark 1.3 by Meta. A price comparison is not possible: one of them has no comparable published price. Muse Spark 1.3 reads more per request: 1.05M tokens against 1M. Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 offers vision, structured output, prompt caching, batch api.